Archive | September, 2011

Procrastination!

I always procrastinate on things I don’t want to do.

This is a pretty simple sentence, but it’s the basis of my latest big Doh!-Moment: Of course I procrastinate on things I don’t want to do! It’s the single most efficient way to make sure I really don’t have to do them! Bonus points if I have a deadline I can miss, because then the whole damn thing is solved as soon as the deadline went by.

Basically I tackled the whole procrastination issue from the wrong end: I know myself well enough that non-negotiable things will be done efficiently and on time.

So instead of kicking myself if I find myself procrastinating, I just need to ask myself a simple, but important question:

Is this really necessary right now?

Most of the time the answer is no. And in this case – why should I bother?

Procrastination is a good thing.

Permalink · Comments { 0 }

Kurt Vonnegut’s 8 Rules For Writing Fiction

1. Use the time of a total stranger in such a way that he or she will not feel the time was wasted.
2. Give the reader at least one character he or she can root for.
3. Every character should want something, even if it is only a glass of water.
4. Every sentence must do one of two things — reveal character or advance the action.
5. Start as close to the end as possible.
6. Be a sadist. Now matter how sweet and innocent your leading characters, make awful things happen to them — in order that the reader may see what they are made of.
7. Write to please just one person. If you open a window and make love to the world, so to speak, your story will get pneumonia.
8. Give your readers as much information as possible as soon as possible. To heck with suspense. Readers should have such complete understanding of what is going on, where and why, that they could finish the story themselves, should cockroaches eat the last few pages.

Source: ; Bagombo Snuff Box: Uncollected Short Fiction, by Kurt Vonnegut Jr.;

 

Permalink · Comments { 2 }

Not sure if I like…

Paladin T13

Paladin T13

But considering that since the days of old Icecrown I loved all paladin specific armour as soon as I saw them ingame, even if i hated the previews – so I am pretty stocked for this one.

What shall I say, armour looks much better on the bloodelf female than on the human male.

And with the ability to change around the displayed armour, I actually might be able to get a visual coherent armour set without having to either go holy. Oh yes. YES. My little paladin won’t have to dress in the hand-me down rags of the warrior tanks anymore.

But this tier set proves once again: WoW’s graphics may be relativly primitive,  but thanks to Blizzards great art direction they still look damn pleasing.

Permalink · Comments { 0 }

character design & portrayal, a regret

If I were to design Chalcara today, she’d look quite different. More regal. More powerful. She’d definitivly have more  … outfit on her.

But If I were to redesign Chalcara to bring it in line with what I know about character design these days, she wouldn’t be my Chalcara anymore.  She, for all intents and purposes, is a legacy character from a time long gone; she’d been concived years before Siendes came around; back then when Mirrough still was supposed to be a whiny, powerless teenager kidnapped from an interstellar highschool. Her outfit irks me, but well, it’s hers. When her made her, I really didn’t know better.

Now, I made a lot incremental improvments during the last year year. Without her armour, her design’s bland enough not to look tittilating, even though I still need to reduce her most common super power a bit1. The-without-armour blandness serves both character and plot purposes, so it’s actually intended.

And when she does wear her armour, the focus is on her broad shoulders instead her boobs, especially now that I try to pull her gem out of her cleavage and closer to her neck. She’s got a very shoulder-heavy design these days and I am still looking for ways how to stress that even more2.

But no, her outfit’s not really what I do regret creating. I can work with that. Even if it means that now I have to design Pridelord Humar to look regal in a loincloth, not an easy feat, but, well…  What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. If the ladies dress skimpy, my gentlemen will too. Fair’s fair.

 

No, what I regret is this panel and it’s less obvious bretheren.

Granted, I felt a bit iffy about it when I drew it, but thought, what the hell. I expected jokes. I got them.

It’s preservence of them, that took me by surprise. And how they coloured perceptions of Chalcara for the last of the chapter.

I shouldn’t have been that fucking naive.

It’s hard to make readers respect a character that’s presented as titellating. Fanservice might be pretty, but as a characterization tool it’s more  that problematic. Because unfortionally the fuckability of a person is inverse proportional to their respectability3. Oh, I wish it weren’t that way, but hey, the ‘good’ ol’ virgin whore dychotomy is still alive and kicking – and whores are to be used, not to be respected.

In the end it’s hard enough to make readers respect a female character even without putting her comprimising positions.  While people in general find it easier to grow emotionally invested in a female character than to a male one, those investment do not necessarly command respect. They can. More often than not they don’t. All those numerous “she’s such a slut/frigid bitch and deserves pain” rants usually come from a place of emotional investment, too.

Anyway, I disgress.

Between Chalcara design and those poses, I’m afraid I did quite a bit of damage to how I actually want people to see her. I might be able to fix it, at least for some readers. Right now the best thing I can do is to stop putting her into compromising positions.  But after how I portrayed her in the first chapter,  I will have a tough time to build her up to the respect commanding, fear inducing powerhorse she’s supposed to be.

Let’s hope I’ll manage it.

In the end it’s just sad that despite all my rants about objectification of women in media, I fell into the trap of doing it myself. *sigh* But maybe it just goes to show how persuavive that shit actually is.

Footnotes:

  1. More for my own sanity than anything else, though. Chally’s girls have too much volume for the particular form she has.
  2. Gogogogogo, Shoulders of Doooooom!
  3. Female managers and politicians basically have to kill all possible sex-appeal in order to be taken seriously – which is quite a hard feat sometimes, there’s no (tasteful) way to make big boobs NOT sexually charged – and even then they’re still getting raked over the coals for being too pretty, or not being pretty enough, for being to stuck up, for being to assertive, for not being woman enough, for not being the right kind of woman, for being incapable, because a woman must’ve slept her way up.
    Even if there ARE respectable reasons to make fun out of them like when they are genuily dumb, the fact that they happen to be female is usually the most obvious target.
Permalink · Comments { 8 }